Mixed Legal Systems

South Africa, Louisiana, Quebec, Cyprus … What do all these countries have in common? They all are so-called mixed jurisdictions or mixed legal systems – both terms are either used interchangeably or the former being part of the latter.

What are Mixed Legal Systems?

Traditionally, mixed legal systems have three key attributes:

(1) Fusion of Civil and Common Law: “Mixed” indicates some type of amalgam of common law and civil law elements.

(2) Adequacy of Civil and Common Law Elements: Contributions of both civil law and common law have to be substantial and recognizable as such to the legal community.

(3) Structural Divide of Common Law and Civil Law: A key characteristic of all mixed jurisdictions is that private law seems to be dominated by civil law elements, whereas public law consists basically of common law elements. According to Professor Palmer, this can usually be ascribed to historical events. Many mixed jurisdictions are former French colonies strongly influenced by the French Code Civil. Later, these colonies fell into British hands. The British, however,normally did not touch the already existing law, but naturally introduced their system of administration.

Assessment of Mixed Legal Systems

The traditional definition of mixed legal systems is more and more challenged. The growing awareness of non-western law that does not fit the typical common law – civil law divide, has made comparative law research focus on alternative ways to define mixed legal systems. As with the question of classification in general, legal traditions have been considered as a defining criteria.

Bibliography

  • Sean Patrick Donlan, Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions: an Introduction, in COMPARATIVE LAW AND HYBRID LEGAL TRADITIONS 9-18 (Eleanor Cashin-Ritaine, Sean Patrick Donlan & Martin Sychold eds., 2010).
  • H. Patrick Glenn et al. eds., STUDIES IN LEGAL SYSTEMS: MIXED AND MIXING (1996).
  • Vernon Valentine Palmer, Mixed Jurisdictions, in ELGAR ENCYCLOPEDIA OF COMPARATIVE LAW 467-474 (Jan Smits ed., 2006).
  • Vernon Valentine Palmer ed., MIXED JURISDICTIONS WORLDWIDE, THE THIRD LEGAL FAMILY (2001).
  • Kenneth Reid, The Idea of Mixed Legal Systems, 78 TUL. L. REV. 5-40 (2004).
  • William Tetley, Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law vs. Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified), 60 LOUISIANA L. REV. 618-738 (2000).

3 thoughts on “Mixed Legal Systems

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s